Hypothesis 2

Will report more attitudes that are negative homosexual guys than toward lesbians.

Technique

Individuals

Individuals had been 224 self-identified heterosexual females between your many years of 18 and 30 have been recruited through the Department of Psychology undergraduate research pool at a big metropolitan college into the southeastern united states of america. The therapy division is amongst the largest into the liberal arts university and reflects the broad diversity that is regional of undergraduate pupils. Individuals taken care of immediately a statement en en titled, “Cultural Differences in personal Attitudes. ” All individuals received partial program credit with regards to their involvement.

As recommended by Savin-Williams (2006), individuals’ heterosexual orientation had been determined via their responses into the Kinsey Heterosexuality-Homosexuality Rating Scales (KRS; Kinsey, Pomeroy, & Martin, 1948). More especially, among self-identified heterosexual individuals, a heterosexual orientation had been verified by recommendation of exclusive heterosexual arousal to men (for example., no reported sexual arousal to women) and intimate experiences that took place mostly or solely with guys. As noted by Savin-Williams (2006), intimate orientation is many reliably evaluated whenever numerous aspects of intimate orientation ( e.g., arousal, behavior, self-identification) are congruent. More sexier cams over, predicated on work regarding intimate orientation identification, Savin-Williams (2006) proposed that the greatest concern get to indices of sexual arousal rather than self-identification and reports of intimate behavior. Certainly, these second the different parts of intimate orientation are far more at risk of context that is social, self-report biases, and adjustable definitions. For instance, prior intimate experiences with people of the exact same intercourse may express sexual experimentation without attendant arousal to people in the sex that is same.

Dining Dining Table 1

Test Means (SD) and Percentages for Age, Education Level, Relationship Status, Average Yearly Income

Note. Individuals one of them table comprise the sample that is final for theory evaluating. There have been 38 African women that are american 37 White females omitted for later on hypothesis evaluating.

Computer-Administered Questionnaires

Individuals completed self-report measures adjusted for computer management via MediaLab 2000 (Empirisoft analysis Software, Philadelphia, PA). Each item and pair of directions ended up being presented sequentially using the pc display screen for each self-report measure.

Demographic type

This form that is self-report information such as for example age, many years of formal training, self-identified sexual orientation, self-identified racial membership, and relationship status.

Kinsey Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale (KRS; Kinsey et al., 1948)

A modified form of this tool had been utilized to evaluate prior sexual arousal and experiences. This 7-point scale asks individuals to speed their intimate arousal and behavioral experiences from 1 (“exclusively heterosexual”) to 7 (“exclusively homosexual”). As noted previously, only individuals who reported exclusive sexual arousal to men and behavioral experiences that have been mostly or solely with men were contained in the analyses (Savin-Williams, 2006).

Attitudes Toward Gay Men Scale (ATGS; Herek, 1988)

This 10-item Likert-type scale examined intimate prejudice particularly toward homosexual guys. Ratings are normally taken for 10 (acutely good attitudes) to 90 (excessively negative attitudes), with greater ratings showing greater quantities of intimate prejudice toward homosexual guys. Sample products include “i do believe male homosexuals are disgusting” and behavior that is“Homosexual two males is simply simple incorrect. ” Interior consistency with this measure typically surpasses. 80, that has been in keeping with the current study (? =. 88).

Attitudes Toward Lesbians Scale (ATLS; Herek, 1988)

This 10-item Likert-type scale examined intimate prejudice particularly toward lesbians. Reactions consist of 10 (excessively good attitudes) to 90 (incredibly negative attitudes), with greater ratings showing greater degrees of intimate prejudice toward lesbians. Sample products include “Female homosexuality is definitely a form that is inferior of” and “Lesbians are ill. ” Interior consistency coefficients because of this scale typically surpass. 85, that was in keeping with the sample that is present? =. 87).

Procedure

Upon arrival into the laboratory, 1 of 2 White, female research assistants greeted individuals and led them to a personal space where they offered consent that is informed. The study assistant told individuals that the goal of the analysis would be to gauge the relationship between social distinctions, social attitudes, and relationship behavior. Individuals were then informed they would expected to accomplish a few questionnaires on a computer, and therefore this technique would simply simply simply take around 20 moments. All individuals were informed which they could will not respond to any relevant concern without penalty. Upcoming, participants separately finished self-administered measures, such as the form that is demographic KRS, ATGS, and ATLS. While extra questionnaires and procedures had been finished, they truly are unrelated towards the study that is present, consequently, aren’t reported. Finally, individuals had been debriefed, compensated with program credit, and thanked because of their involvement.

Results

Descriptive Analyses

Dining Table 2

Means (SD) for Sexual Prejudice Toward Gay Men and Lesbians Among African American and White Females

Note. In just a adjustable line and an adjustable line, means with various superscript notations differ considerably at p * 10 (low intimate prejudice) ?90 (high intimate prejudice).