Data were analysed playing with SPSS twenty five.0. Earliest descriptive analyses was in fact performed, plus Cronbach’s alphas and you will wavelengths. Binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate relationships between sex, decades, sexual orientation, that have an intimate/intimate partner, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and you may desire to take part in sexting just like the independent variables, plus the four sexting behaviors as built variables. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is thought to be a measure of impression dimensions. Most of the parameters was joined with the design on the other hand. The analysis has also been stratified by the intercourse.
Frequency away from sexting behaviours
The most prevalent sexting behaviours get (21.2%) and obtaining thru an intermediary (twenty-eight.4%), accompanied by third-people forwarding from sexual stuff (nine.3%) and, lastly, delivering (8.1%). Descriptive analytics receive inside Table dos.
The new regression designs were extreme. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 are .42 into “sending” model, .30 towards “receiving” design, .23 with the “third-team forwarding” model, and you can .17 towards the “researching via a mediator” design (Table step 3:
Throughout the “sending” design, willingness to help you sext (OR: 8.26; 95% depend on period [CI]: 5.36-), that have a romantic/intimate mate (OR: 3.44; 95% CI: 2.25-5.25), having fun with Snapchat (OR: 1.87; 95% CI: step 1.19-2.93), intimate positioning (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-step 3.00) and you will decades (OR: step 1.36; 95% CI: step 1.step one4-1.63) have been rather related to delivering involvement. Throughout the “receiving” design, which have a romantic/intimate partner (OR: step 3.27; 95% CI: dos.51-4.28), determination so you’re able to sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 2.01-step three.89), having fun with Instagram (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-step 3.10), intercourse (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: step 1.37-dos.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: step 1.61; 95% CI: step one.dos1-2.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: 1.20-step one.86) and you will decades (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step one.step 12-1.41) had been significantly about finding wedding.
In the “third-party forwarding” design, having fun with Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: 1.16-six.51), readiness in order to sext (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: step one.48-dos.72), intercourse (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.32-2.91), with an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: step 1.86; 95% CI: step one.dos9-2.68), using Facebook (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-step one.87) and years (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step one.22-1.66) have been notably pertaining to engagement from inside the third-class forwarding.
Regarding the “receiving through a mediator” model https://lovingwomen.org/es/blog/sitios-asian-dating/, playing with Instagram (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.84; 95% CI: step 1.5dos-2.24), having a romantic/intimate lover (OR: step one.71; 95% CI: 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: 1.4step 1; 95% CI: step one.1step 1-step 1.80) and age (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step 1.23-step one.49) had been rather pertaining to wedding for the getting through a mediator.
Gender distinctions
The regression habits was high. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen 2 was .fifty for females and you may .41 getting guys on “sending” model; .31 for females and you may .29 to have boys on the “receiving” model; .18 for girls and .twenty-four to own people with the “third-team forwarding” model; and you can .14 for girls and you can .twenty two to possess boys on “receiving via a mediator” model (Desk 4:
On “sending” design, for females, readiness to help you sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an enchanting/sexual mate (OR: 4.54; 95% CI: 2.27-nine.09) and you will age (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: step one.17-2.20) were somewhat regarding giving wedding. For guys, these people were willingness so you’re able to sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-nine.94), having an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: dos.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and using Snapchat (OR: dos.38; 95% CI: step 1.32-cuatro.29).
About “receiving” design, for women, readiness to sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: dos.57-), using Instagram (OR: 4.34; 95% CI: step 1.43-), which have an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: step 3.77; 95% CI: 2.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.13-2.33) and you will decades (OR: step 1.42; 95% CI: step 1.step 17-step one.72) was in fact notably related to receiving engagement. To have people, they were that have an enchanting/intimate partner (OR: 2.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness so you can sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.58-step 3.41), having fun with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.91), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.40; 95% CI: step 1.06-step one.86) and you can ages (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: step 1.04-1.38).
