Such as for instance, sexuality otherwise government have been especially mutual because of the you to definitely meme friends for each

A more systematic analysis of the families’ cohesiveness based on T-Tests for the mean differences between generic attributes within and outside a meme families reaffirmed this tendency. We found significantly more common attributes between meme instances from the same family. In general, each instance shared more attributes with other family members (3.49) than with nonfamily members (2.39), T(18865) = , p < .01. This similarity between instances of the same family is significant in terms of content (T(6534) = , p < .01), participants (T(12755) = , p < .01), and form (T(16379) = 41.2, p < .01).

Yet, when looking individually in the stuff, contribution, and you can form properties, grati e single there had been of several parents having nonsignificant differences between the latest mean interior and you may external well-known qualities. This was particularly so into the content characteristic. Only a dozen off fifty meme parents mutual alot more articles services in family unit members. Put differently, stuff features had been less natural in the most common meme household. In addition, from inside the family members was indeed stuff is actually discovered to be significantly more cohesive, it had been along with a lot more unique and you may special.

Furthermore, very meme family got men in addition to teen and you will more youthful adult people since their preferred features. Other a long time, like seniors, adults, kids, and children in addition to ladies, famous people, and particularly creature professionals was basically much more unique to certain meme parents. Eventually, in terms of function, very meme parents put straightforward photo which have text message otherwise videos. Meme families where means try a whole lot more cohesive shared remix and you can visual control and additionally acronyms and you may wordplay.

The organization anywhere between cohesiveness and you may uniqueness

The cohesiveness of meme families around more unique generic attributes already provided a partial answer to RQ4, regarding the link between cohesiveness and uniqueness in meme families, and a Pearson correlation between the two revealed a very strong and significant positive correlation (r = .911, p < .001). In other words, the more unique the shared attributes within a meme family, the higher the difference between shared attributes within and outside a meme family. When looking at each group of attributes separately, it was mainly the uniqueness of form (r = .870, p < .001) and content (r = .726, p < .001) attributes that positively correlated with family cohesiveness. The uniqueness of participation attributes had a weaker correlation with family cohesiveness (r = .366, p < .01).

Quiddities, concreteness, uniqueness, and you will cohesiveness

In response to the last research question, we found a significant positive correlation between quiddity concreteness and both the cohesiveness (r = .363, p < .01) and uniqueness (r = .431, p < .01) of Internet memes. In other words, a meme family with a more concrete quiddity was also more cohesive and unique in its generic attributes.

In particular, a significant positive correlation was found between the percentage of instances in a meme family sharing a similar object and the cohesiveness (r = .286, p < .05) and uniqueness (r = .349, p < .05) of their content. This suggests that instances of meme families in which the quiddity is a specific object tend also to deal with the same unique themes. Thus, for example, instances of the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” family always included this specific character or object, and many of them also contained references to religion, which is a unique theme in the memetic sphere.

Meme families in which the quiddity is a character, such as “Charlie the Unicorn,” are more cohesive, but also unique in terms of participation. This is typically reflected in a higher percentage of instances containing animal participants. Perhaps less obvious is the negative correlation between action and uniqueness of participation (r = ?.329, p < .05). This means that the participants in meme families in which the main quiddity is an action are not unique, but rather part of the mainstream. Thus, for example, most participants of “Caramelldansen,” “The Evolution of Dance,” or “Planking” are teens or young adults.

Comments are closed.