Complainant claims one Respondent lures users on Domains which have confusingly equivalent websites and websites. The newest obtaining pages of your own Domains are particularly similar, and you will purport to own same properties. The website at
Website name plainly displays the language “Much Seafood Relationships” and you will proclaims: “Sign up one of the better online dating site certainly one of other internet dating sites and you may see attractive american singles off any part of Globe.” In addition, the new squeeze page provides links so you’re able to fighting internet dating websites, and “theseniordating”, “singlecougar”, and “filipinocupid”.
Domain furthermore screens the text “POF Free 100% Free online Dating”, and you will “Join Free-of-charge 100% Free Singles Dating internet site”. As well, it squeeze page alsoprovides hyperlinks so you’re able to competing matchmaking other sites, such as the “filipinocupid” website.
Complainant states so it has never subscribed Respondent to make use of any of one’s PLENTYOFFISH Marks, nor one draw confusingly equivalent thereto, since good e. Continue reading
